Copper alloys in aquaculture

Copper alloys are significant netting materials in aquaculture (the farming of aquatic organisms Including fish farming ). Various other materials including nylon , polyester , polypropylene , polyethylene , plastic-coated welded wire , rubber , patented twine products (Spectra, Dyneema), and galvanized steel are also used for netting in aquarium fish enclosures around the world. [1] [2] [3] [4] [5]All of these materials are selected for a variety of reasons, including design feasibility, material strength , cost, and corrosion resistance .

What sets copper alloys apart from the other materials used in fish farming is that they are antimicrobial , that is, they destroy bacteria , viruses , fungi , algae , and other microbes. (For information about the antimicrobial properties of copper and its alloys, see Antimicrobial properties of copper and Antimicrobial copper alloy touch surfaces ).

In the marine environment , the antimicrobial / algaecidal properties of copper alloys prevent biofouling , which can be described as undesirable accumulation, adhesion, and growth of microorganisms , plants , algae , tube worms , barnacles , mollusks , and other organisms. made marine structures. [6] By inhibiting microbial growth, copper alloy aquaculture, and avoiding the need for costly net changes. The resistance of organism growth on copper alloys also provides a cleaner and healthier environment for growing fish to grow and thrive.

In addition to their antifouling benefits, copper alloys have strong structural and corrosion-resistant properties in marine environments.

It is the combination of these properties – antifouling, high strength, and corrosion resistance – that has made copper alloys a desirable material for such marine applications as to condense tubing, water intake screens, ship hulls , offshore structure, and sheathing. In the past 25 years or so, the benefits of copper alloys have caught the attention of the marine aquaculture industry. The industry is now actively deploying copper alloy netting and structural materials in commercial large-scale fish farming operations around the world.

Importance of aquaculture

See also: Aquaculture , Fish farming , Mariculture , and Overfishing

Much has been written about the degradation of natural fish stocks in rivers , estuaries , and the oceans (see also Overfishing ). [7] [8] Because industrial fishing has become extremely efficient, such as tuna , cod , and halibut have declined by 90% in the past 50 years. [9] [10] [11]

Aquaculture , an industry that has emerged in recent decades, has become one of the fastest growing sectors of the world food economy. [2] Aquaculture already supplies more than half of the world’s demand for fish. [12] This percentage is predicted to increase dramatically over the next few decades.

The problem of biofouling

Copper alloy mesh installed at Atlantic salmon fish farm in Tasmania . Foreground: the link chain copper alloy mesh resting on a dock. Distant background: copper alloy mesh is installed on the fish farm.

Biofouling is one of the biggest problems in aquaculture. [13] Biofouling occurs on non-copper materials in the marine environment, including fish pen surfaces and nettings . [2] For example, It was Noted que la open area of a mesh Immersed for only seven days in a Tasmanian aquaculture operation Decreased by 37% as a result of biofouling. [14]

The biofouling process begins when algae spores , marine invertebrate larvae , and other organic material adhere to submerged surfaces in marine environments (eg, fish nets in aquaculture). Bacteria then encourages the attachment of secondary unwanted colonizers. [2] [15]

Biofouling has strong negative impacts on aquaculture operations. Water flow and dissolved oxygen are inhibited in fish pens. [16] [17] The end result is Often diseased fish from infections, Such As netpen liver disease, [18] amoebic gill disease , [19] and parasites. [20] [21] Other negative impacts include increased fish mortality, reduced fish production, reduced fish production, reduced fish production and profitability, and an adversely impacted environment near fish farms. [2] [22] [23]

Biofouling adds enormous weight to submerged fish netting. Two hundredfold increases in weight have been reported. [24] [25] This translates, for example, to two thousand pounds of unwanted organisms. In South Australia , biofouling weighing 6.5 tonnes (approximately 13,000 pounds) was observed on a fish pen net. [26] This extra burden often results in net breakage and additional maintenance costs.

To fight parasites from biofouling in finfish aquaculture, treatment protocols such as cypermethrin , azamethiphos, and emamectin benzoate may be used, but these have been found to have detrimental environmental effects, for example, in lobster operations. [27] [28] [29] [30] [31]

To treat diseases in fish raised in biofouled nets, fish stocks are administered antibiotics . The antibiotics may be unwanted long-term health effects on the environment. [32] To fight biofouling, operators often implement such changes, such as frequent net changing, cleaning / removal of unwanted net bodies, net repairs, and chemical treatment including antimicrobial coatings on nylon nets. [19] [33] [34] [35] The cost of antifouling a single net salmon can be several thousand British pounds . [2]In some sectors of the European aquaculture industry, biofouled fish and shellfish can cost 5-20% of its market value. Heavy fouling can reduce the salty product in net by 60-90%. [22]

Antifouling coatings are often used on nylon nets because the process is more economical than manual cleaning. [36] When nylon nets are coated with antifouling compounds, the coatings repel biofouling for a period of time, usually between several weeks to several months. However, the nets eventually succumb to biofouling. Antifouling coatings containing cuprous oxide algaecide / biocide are the coatings technology used almost exclusively in the fish farming industry today. The treatments usually take place within a few weeks to six to eight months. [2] [37]

Biofouled is a multipurpose, costly, and labor-intensive operation that involves various and specialized personnel. During this process, live fish in the net should be transferred to clean pens, which causes stress and asphyxiation that results in some loss of fish. [38] Biofouled nets that can be reused by washing and scrubbing or high-pressure water hosing. They are then dried and re-impregnated with antifouling coatings. [25] [37] [39] [40]

A line of net cleaners is available for in-situ washings where permitted. [41] But, Even where not permitted by environmental, fisheries, maritime, and sanitary autorités, shoulds the Lack of dissolved oxygen in submerged pens create an emergency requirement That endangers the health of fish, various May be Deployed with special in-situ cleaning machinery to scrub biofouled nets. [37]

The aquaculture industry is addressing the negative environmental impacts from its operations (see aquaculture issues ). As the industry evolves, a cleaner, more sustainable aquaculture industry is expected to emerge, one that can be trusted with anti-fouling, anti-corrosive, and strong structural properties, such as copper alloys.

Antifouling properties of copper alloys

There is no biofouling in the waters of the North Atlantic (foreground), with hydroids having grown on high-density polyethylene tubing (background).
See also: Antimicrobial properties of copper and Antimicrobial copper alloy touch surfaces

In the aquaculture industry, we are talking about keeping the animal husbandry translates to keeping fish clean, well fed, healthy, and not overcrowded. [42] One solution to keeping a healthy fish is antifouling copper alloy net and structures. [43]

Researchers have attributed copper resistance to biofouling, even in temperate waters, to two possible mechanisms: 1) a retarding sequence of colonization through release of antimicrobial copper ions, thereby preventing the attachment of microbial layers to marine surfaces; [44] and, 2) separating layers that contain corrosive products and the spores of juveniles or macro-encrusting organisms. [45]

The most important requirement for optimum biofouling resistance is that the copper alloys should be freely exposed or electrically insulated from less noble alloys and from cathodic protection. Galvanic coupling to less noble alloys and cathodic protection preventing copper ion releases from surface films and thus reducing biofouling resistance. [46]

As temperatures increase and water velocities decrease in marine waters, biofouling rates dramatically rise. However, copper’s resistance to biofouling is observed in temperate waters. Studies in the Herradura Bay, Coquimbo , Chile , where biofouling conditions are extreme, demonstrated that a copper alloy (90% copper, 10% nickel) avoided macro-encrusting organisms. [45]

Corrosion behavior of copper alloys

Copper alloys used in sea water have high general corrosion rates. A technical discussion concerning various types of corrosion, application considerations (eg, depth of installations, effect of polluted waters, sea conditions), and the corrosion characteristics of several copper alloys used in aquaculture netting is available (ie, copper-nickel, copper- zinc, and copper-silicon [47] ).

Early examples of copper sheathing

Prior to the late 1700s, hulls were made almost entirely of wood, often white oak. Sacrificial planking was the common mode of hull protection. This technique is included in a protective 1/2-inch thick layer of wood, often pine, to reduce the risk of damage. This layer has been broken down when infested with marine borers. [48] Copper sheathing for bio-resistant ship hulls was developed in the late 18th century. In 1761, the hull of the Royal British Navy’s HMS Alarm was fully sheathed in copper to prevent attack by Teredo worms in tropical waters. [49] The copper reduced biofouling of the hull, which enabled ships to move faster than those who did not have copper sheathed hulls.

Environmental performance of copper alloy mesh

Many complicated factors influence the environmental performance of copper alloys in aquaculture operations. A technical description of antibiofouling mechanisms, fish health and welfare, fish losses due to escapes and predator attacks, and reduced life cycle environmental impacts is summarized in this reference.[50]

Types of copper alloys

Section of a fish net on a salmonfarm near Puerto Montt, Chile. The copper alloy woven mesh inside the frame has resisted biofouling whereas PVC (i.e., the frame around the mesh) is heavily fouled.

Copper–zinc brass alloys are currently (2011) being deployed in commercial-scale aquaculture operations in Asia, South America and the US (Hawaii). Extensive research, including demonstrations and trials, are currently being implemented on two other copper alloys: copper-nickel and copper-silicon. Each of these alloy types has an inherent ability to reduce biofouling, pen waste, disease, and the need for antibiotics while simultaneously maintaining water circulation and oxygen requirements. Other types of copper alloys are also being considered for research and development in aquaculture operations.

The University of New Hampshire is in the midst of conducting experiments under the auspices of the International Copper Association (ICA)[51] to evaluate the structural, hydrodynamic, and antifouling response of copper alloy nets. Factors to be determined from these experiments, such as drag, pen dynamic loads, material loss, and biological growth – well documented for nylon netting but not fully understood for copper-nickel alloy nets – will help to design fish pen enclosures made from these alloys. The East China Sea Fisheries Research Institute, in Shanghai, China, is also conducting experimental investigations on copper alloys for ICA.

Copper–zinc alloys

The Mitsubishi-Shindoh Co., Ltd., has developed a proprietary copper-zinc brass alloy, called UR30,[52] specifically designed for aquaculture operations. The alloy, which is composed of 64% copper, 35.1% zinc, 0.6% tin, and 0.3% nickel, resists mechanical abrasion when formed into wires and fabricated into chain link, woven, or other types of flexible mesh. Corrosion rates depend on the depth of submersion and seawater conditions. The average reported corrosion rate reported for the alloy is < 5 μm/yr based on two- and five-year exposure trials in seawater.[53]

The Ashimori Industry Company, Ltd., has installed approximately 300 flexible pens with woven chain link UR30 meshes in Japan to raise Seriola (i.e., yellowtail, amberjack, kingfish, hamachi). The company has installed another 32 brass pens to raise Atlantic salmon at the Van Diemen Aquaculture operations in Tasmania, Australia. In Chile, EcoSea Farming S.A. has installed a total of 62 woven chain link brass mesh pens to raise trout and Atlantic salmon.[53] In Panama, China, Korea, Turkey, and the United States, demonstrations and trials are underway using

To date, in over 10 years of aquaculture experience, these products have not suffered from dezincification , stress corrosion cracking , or erosion corrosion .

Copper-nickel alloys

Main article: Cupronickel

Copper-nickel alloys were developed specifically for seawater applications over five decades ago. Today, these alloys are being investigated for their potential use in aquaculture.

Copper-nickel alloys for marine applications are usually 90% copper, 10% nickel, and small amounts of manganese and iron to enhance corrosion resistance. The seawater corrosion resistance of copper-nickel alloys results in a thin, adherent, protective surface film which forms naturally and quickly on the face of exposure to clean seawater. [54]

The spleen of corrosion protective formation is temperature dependent. For example, at 27 ° C (ie, a common inlet temperature in the Middle East), rapid film formation and good corrosion protection can be expected within a few hours. At 16 ° C, it could take 2-3 months for the protection to mature. But once a good surface film forms, corrosion rates decrease, normally to 0.02-0.002 mm / yr, as protective layers develop over a period of years. [55] These alloys-have Good resistance to chloride pitting and crevice corrosion and are not susceptible to chloride stress corrosion.

Copper-silicon alloys

Copper-Silicon: has a long history of use as screws , nuts , bolts , washers , pins , lag bolts , and staples in wooden sailing vessels in marine environments. The alloys are often composed of copper, silicon, and manganese. The inclusion of silicon strengthens the metal.

As with the copper-nickel alloys, corrosion resistance of copper-silicon is due to protect the films that form on the surface over a period of time. General corrosion rates of 0.025-0.050mm have been observed in quiet waters. This rate decreases towards the end of the range over long-term exposures (eg, 400-600 days). There is no pitting with the silicon-bronzes. Also there is good resistance to erosion corrosion up to moderate flow rates. Because copper-silicon is weldable, rigid thought can be constructed with this material. Also, because copper-silicon mesh is lighter than copper-zinc chain link, aquaculture enclosures made with copper-silicon can be lighter in weight and therefore a less expensive alternative.

Luvata Appleton, LLC, is researching and developing a line of copper alloy woven and welded meshes, including a patent-pending copper silicon alloy, which are marketed under the Seawire trade name. [56] Copper-silicon alloys have been developed by the firm to test different types of testing. These include raising cobia in Panama, lobsters in the US state of Maine, and crabs in the Chesapeake Bay. The company is working with various universities to study its material, including the University of Arizona to study shrimp , the University of New Hampshire to study cod , andOregon State University to study oysters .

See also

  • Antimicrobial copper-alloy touch surfaces
  • Antimicrobial properties of copper
  • Antimicrobial properties of brass

References

  1. Jump up^ Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications, and Opportunities, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, July 2008, p. 53
  2. ^ Jump up to:g Braithwaite, RA; McEvoy, LA (2005). “Marine biofouling on fish farms and its remediation”. Advances in marine biology . Advances in Marine Biology. 47 : 215-52. doi : 10.1016 / S0065-2881 (04) 47003-5 . ISBN  9780120261482 . PMID  15596168 .
  3. Jump up^ “Commercial and research fish farming and aquaculture netting and supplies” . Sterlingnets.com . Retrieved 2010-06-16 .
  4. Jump up^ “Aquaculture Netting by Industrial Netting” . Industrialnetting.com . Retrieved 2010-06-16 .
  5. Jump up^ Southern Regional Aquaculture Center at “Archived copy” (PDF) . Archived from the original (PDF) on 19 November 2010 . Retrieved 15 August 2011 .
  6. Jump up^ Marine Fouling and its Prevention, Wood Hole Oceanographic Institution, 1952, United States Naval Institute, Annapolis, Maryland, USA
  7. Jump up^ Myers, Ransom A .; Worm, Boris (2003). “Rapid worldwide depletion of predatory fish communities”. Nature . 423 (6937): 280-3. doi : 10.1038 / nature01610 . PMID  12748640 .
  8. Jump up^ The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture (SOFIA), Biennial Report, 2005, as summarized in Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations
  9. Jump up^ Next Seafood Frontier: The Ocean, April 28, 2009, references article by Myers in Nature
  10. Jump up^ Alessandra Bianchi (2009-04-28). “The next seafood frontier: The open ocean – Apr. 28, 2009” . Money.cnn.com . Retrieved 2010-06-16 .
  11. Jump up^ Tietenberg, Tom(2006), Environmental and Natural Resource Economics: A Contemporary Approach, p. 28, Pearson / Addison Wesley. ISBN 0-321-30504-3
  12. Jump up^ Half Of Fish Consumed Globally Is Now Raised On Farms, Study Finds Science Daily, September 8, 2009
  13. Jump up^ Design Guide: Copper Alloy Mesh in Marine Aquaculture, International Copper Research Association Inc. (INCRA), 1984
  14. Jump up^ Hodson, Stephen; Burke, Christopher; Lewis, Thomas (1995). “In situ quantification of fish-cage fouling by underwater photography and image analysis”. Biofouling . 9 (2): 145. doi : 10.1080 / 08927019509378298 .
  15. Jump up^ Bakus, Gerald J .; Targett, Nancy M .; Schulte, Bruce (1986). “Chemical ecology of marine organisms: an overview”. Journal of Chemical Ecology . 12 (5): 951. doi : 10.1007 / BF01638991 .
  16. Jump up^ Eckman, JE; et al. (2001). “Performance of cages as large animal-exclusion devices in the deep sea” . Journal of Marine Research . 59 : 79-95. doi : 10.1357 / 002224001321237371 .
  17. Jump up^ Ahlgren, MO, (1998), Consumption and assimilation of salmon net pen fouling debris by the red sea cucumber Parastichopus califormicus: Implications for poly-culture, Journal of the World Aquaculture Society, Vol. 29, pp. 133-139
  18. Jump up^ Andersen, RJ; Luu, HA; Chen, DZ; Holmes, CF; Kent, ML; The White, M; Taylor, FJ; Williams, DE (1993). “Chemical and biological evidence links microcystins to salmon ‘netpen liver disease ‘ “. Toxicon . 31 (10): 1315-23. doi : 10.1016 / 0041-0101 (93) 90404-7 . PMID  8303725 .
  19. ^ Jump up to:b Nowak, C; Nowak, Barbara F; Hodson, Stephen L (2002). Biofouling as a reservoir of Neoparamoeba pemaquidensis (Page, 1970), the causative agent of amoebic gill disease in Atlantic salmon. Aquaculture . 210 : 49. doi : 10.1016 / S0044-8486 (01) 00858-4 .
  20. Jump up^ González, L (1998). “The life cycle of Hysterothylacium aduncum (Nematoda: Anisakidae) in Chilean marine farms”. Aquaculture . 162 (3-4): 173. doi : 10.1016 / S0044-8486 (97) 00303-7 .
  21. Jump up^ Huse, I; Bjordal, A; Ferno, A; Furevik, D (1990). “The effect of shading in pen rearing of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)”. Aquacultural Engineering . 9(4): 235. doi : 10.1016 / 0144-8609 (90) 90018-U .
  22. ^ Jump up to:b Collective research on Aquaculture Biofouling
  23. Jump up^ Folke, C .; et al. (1997). “Salmon farming in context: Response to Black et al” . Journal of Environmental Management . 50 : 95-103. doi : 10.1006 / jema.1996.0097 .
  24. Jump up^ Milne, PH, (1970), Fish Farming: A Guide to Design and Construction of Net Enclosures, Marine Research, Vol. 1, pp. 1-31ISBN 0-11-490463-4
  25. ^ Jump up to:a Beveridge B , M. (2004), Cage Aquaculture. The University Press, Cambridge ISBN  1-4051-0842-8
  26. Jump up^ Cronin, ER; Cheshire, AC; Clarke, SM; Melville, AJ (1999). “An investigation into the composition, biomass and oxygen budget of the fouling community on a tuna aquaculture farm”. Biofouling . 13 (4): 279. doi :10.1080 / 08927019909378386 .
  27. Jump up^ Burridge, L; Haya, K; Zitko, V; Waddy, S (1999). “Lethality of Salmosan (Azamethiphos) to American Lobster (Homarus americanus) Larvae, Postlarvae, and Adults”. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety . 43 (2): 165-9. doi : 10.1006 / eesa.1999.1771 . PMID  10375419 .
  28. Jump up^ Burridge, L (2000). “The lethality of the cypermethrin formulation Excis to larval and post-larval stages of the American lobster (Homarus americanus)”. Aquaculture . 182 : 37. doi : 10.1016 / S0044-8486 (99) 00252-5 .
  29. Jump up^ Burridge, L (2000). “The lethality of anti-sea lice Salmosan formulations (Azamethiphos) and Excis (Cypermethrin) to stage IV and adult lobsters (Homarus americanus) during repeated short-term exposures”. Aquaculture . 182 : 27. doi : 10.1016 / S0044-8486 (99) 00251-3 .
  30. Jump up^ Ernst, W; Jackman, P; Doe, K; Page, F; Julien, G; MacKay, K; Sutherland, T (2001). “Dispersion and Toxicity to Non-Target Aquatic Organisms of Pesticides Used to Treat Sea Lice on Salmon in Net Pen Enclosures”. Marine Pollution Bulletin . 42 (6): 433-44. doi : 10.1016 / S0025-326X (00) 00177-6 . PMID  11468921 .
  31. Jump up^ Waddy, SL; et al. (2002). “Emamectin benzoate induces molting in American lobster Homarus americanus” (PDF) . Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences . 59 (7): 1096-1099. doi : 10.1139 / F02-106 .
  32. Jump up^ The next seafood frontier: The ocean, April 28, 2009, references article by Myers in Nature;
  33. Jump up^ Hodson, S (1997). “Biofouling of fish-cage netting: efficiency and problems of in situ cleaning”. Aquaculture . 152 : 77. doi : 10.1016 / S0044-8486 (97) 00007-0 .
  34. Jump up^ Li, S. (1994), Fish culture in cages and pens: Freshwater Fish Culture in China: Principles and Practice, pp. 305-346, Elsevier, AmsterdamISBN 0-444-88882-9
  35. Jump up^ Beveridge, M. (1996), Cage Aquaculture, The University Press, Cambridge
  36. Jump up^ Short, J; Thrower, F (1987). “Toxicity of tri-n-butyl-tin to chinook salmon, Oncorhynchus tshawytscha, adapted to seawater”. Aquaculture . 61 (3-4): 193. doi : 10.1016 / 0044-8486 (87) 90148-7 .
  37. ^ Jump up to:c Alberto Jose Disselkoen and Ochoa (2009), Floating device to clean net , Patent Application 12 / 455.150, publication US 2010/0006036 A1 Filing Date: May 27; and National Chilean Patent Application No. 1565-2008 filed on May 29, 2008
  38. Jump up^ Paclibare et al., (1994), Clearing of the kidney-disease bacterium Renibacterium salmoninarum from seawater by the blue mussel Mytilus edulis, and the status of the mussel as a tank of the bacterium, Diseases of Aquatic Organisms, Vol. 18, pp. 129-133
  39. Jump up^ Enright, C., (1993), Control of fouling in bivalve aquaculture, World Aquaculture, Vol. 24, pp. 44-46
  40. Jump up^ Lee et al., (1985), Remarks on the use of antifouling paint in netcage fish farming in Singapore, Singapore Journal of Primary Industries, Vol. 13, pp. 1-12
  41. Jump up^ Idema Net Cleaning Systems
  42. Jump up^ Offshore Aquaculture in the United States: Economic Considerations, Implications, & Opportunities, US Department of Commerce, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, July 2008
  43. Jump up^ “Copper Nickel: References” . Copper.org . Retrieved 2010-06-16 .
  44. Jump up^ Sutherland, IW, 1983, Microbial exopolysaccharides: Their role in microbial adhesion in aqueous systems, Critical Reviews in Microbiology, Vol. 10, pp.173-201
  45. ^ Jump up to:b Edding, Mario E. Flores, Hector, and Miranda, Claudio (1995), Experimental Use of Copper-Nickel Alloy Mesh in Mariculture. Part 1: Feasibility of use in a temperate zone; Part 2: Demonstration of use in a cold zone; Final report to the International Copper Association Ltd.
  46. Jump up^ Powell, Carol and Stillman, Hal (2009),Corrosion behavior of copper alloys used in marine aquaculture
  47. Jump up^ Corrosion Behavior of Copper Alloys used in Marine Aquaculture
  48. Jump up^ Copper Sheathing; GlobalSecurity.org; http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/systems/ship/copper-sheathing.htm
  49. Jump up^ Old Copper; Archived copy . Archived from the original on 18 May 2011 . Retrieved 23 July 2010 .
  50. Jump up^ Environmental Performance of Alloy Mesh Copper in Marine Fish Farming: The Case for Using Solid Copper Alloy Mesh
  51. Jump up^ “Welcome to CopperInfo – Your Copper Information Source Worldwide” . Copperinfo.com . Retrieved 16 June 2010 .
  52. Jump up^ Craig Craven. “UR_Chemicals” . Mitsubishi-shindoh.com . Retrieved 16 June 2010 .
  53. ^ Jump up to:b EcoSea Farming SA
  54. Jump up^ “Copper Nickels: Seawater Corrosion Resistance and Antifouling” . Copper.org. December 15, 2005 . Retrieved 16 June 2010 .
  55. Jump up^ The Application of Copper-Nickel Alloys in Marine Systems, CDA Inc. Seminar-Technical Report 7044-1919, 1996; http://www.copper.org/applications/cuni/txt_swater_corrosion_resistance.html
  56. Jump up^ http://www.luvata.com; Seawire is a trademark of Luvata Appleton, LLC. The company intends to market a range of alloys in addition to copper-silicon under this trademark

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *